Autonomous Freedom in Modern Liberalism’s Anthropological Project: A Theological Critique in the Light of the Incarnation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63931/pasrj.v6i1.85

Keywords:

Incarnation, Modern Liberalism, Christology, Autonomous Freedom

Abstract

This article offers an expository and analytical study of modern liberalism by examining its meaning, socio-political foundations, and economic structures. Rather than approaching liberalism solely as a political arrangement or policy framework, the study treats it as a developing anthropological and moral vision that shapes modern understandings of freedom, autonomy, and the human person. First, the study clarifies the meaning of modern liberalism by tracing its conceptual development from classical liberalism to its modern forms, highlighting its defining commitments to individual autonomy, state neutrality, and pluralism. Durkheim’s principle of social solidarity is recalled here, showing how liberalism’s emphasis on autonomy weakens collective moral bonds once sustained by religion. Second, modern liberalism is situated within its socio-political context, examining its emergence from the collapse of religious authority, the fragmentation of moral consensus, and the liberal state’s attempt to manage diversity through procedural neutrality. Weber’s notion of social action is contrasted with liberalism, which redefines human purpose away from transcendent vocation toward secular autonomy, reshaping the meaning of freedom in modern society. The third part analyzes the economic foundations of modern liberalism, focusing on the anthropological assumptions embedded in liberal economics, the role of market logic in reinforcing autonomous freedom, and the ways economic liberalism contributes to moral and social fragmentation. Methodologically, the study employs a historical-conceptual and interdisciplinary approach, drawing from political philosophy, social theory, and economic thought to present a coherent exposition of modern liberalism as a unified project rather than a collection of isolated ideas.  The article is primarily descriptive and analytical, aiming to clarify the internal logic and development of modern liberalism before any normative or theological evaluation is undertaken. By exposing the underlying assumptions about freedom, reason, and the human person that unite its political and economic dimensions, the study prepares the ground for further theological reflection on the adequacy of modern liberalism as a moral framework in contemporary society.

Author Biography

  • Ms. Mariel B. Blanza, UST Graduate School

    Mariel Bersamin Blanza is a student and PhD candidate at the University of Santo Tomas Graduate School, while concurrently serving as an assistant professor of theology. Her academic work centers on Christology, with particular engagement in the thought of Fr. Thomas Joseph White and the theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. She is especially interested in exploring the relationship between Christology and moral theology, contributing to contemporary discussions on faith, reason, and moral formation.

References

[1] Austriaco, N. P. G. (2021). Biomedicine and beatitude: An introduction to Catholic bioethics (2nd ed.). The Catholic University of America Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1tfw0p2

[2] Berlin, I. (2002). Two concepts of liberty. In Liberty: Incorporating four essays on liberty (pp. 166–217). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/019924989X.003.0004

[3] Berkowitz, P. (1999). Virtue and the making of modern liberalism. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822904

[4] Blumenberg, H. (1983). The legitimacy of the modern age. MIT Press.

[5] Carthill, A. (1927). The legacy of liberalism. Methuen & Co.

[6] Cowart, V. R. (2003). An outline of modern liberalism: 1933–2003. AuthorHouse.

[7] Descartes, R. (1981). L’entretien avec Burman (J.-M. Beyssade, Trans.). Presses Universitaires de France.

[8] Durkheim, É. (2020). The division of labor in society (Updated ed.). Routledge.

[9] Fishkin, J. S. (1984). Defending equality: A view from the cave. Michigan Law Review, 82(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1288671

[10] Fortin, E. (1982). The new rights theory and the natural law. Review of Politics, 44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500041504

[11] Frohnen, B. (1996). The new communitarians and the crisis of modern liberalism. University Press of Kansas.

[12] Gaus, G. F. (1983). The modern liberal theory of man. Routledge.

[13] Gellot, L. (1994). The family, liberalism, and Catholic social teaching. In R. B. Douglass & D. Hollenbach (Eds.), Catholicism and liberalism: Contributions to American public philosophy. Cambridge University Press.

[14] Hobbes, T. (1962). Leviathan (M. Oakeshott, Ed.). Macmillan.

[15] Hollenbach, D. (1994). A communitarian reconstruction of human rights: Contributions from Catholic tradition. In R. B. Douglass & D. Hollenbach (Eds.), Catholicism and liberalism: Contributions to American public philosophy. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627965.007

[16] Hoover, K. R. (1987). Ideology and political life. Brooks/Cole.

[17] Kelly, P. (2004). Liberalism. Polity Press.

[18] Komonchak, J. (1994). Vatican II and the encounter between Catholicism and liberalism. In R. B. Douglass & D. Hollenbach (Eds.), Catholicism and liberalism: Contributions to American public philosophy. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627965.005

[19] MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue (2nd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press.

[20] McClure, C. S. (2011). Hell and anxiety in Hobbes’s Leviathan. The Review of Politics, 73(1), 1–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23016490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670510000847

[21] Mendus, S. (1989). Mill and the case for diversity. In Toleration and the limits of liberalism. Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20056-6

[22] Mitchell, M. T. (2018). The limits of liberalism: Tradition, individualism, and the crisis of freedom. University of Notre Dame Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpj7961

[23] Mullender, R. (2021). Apostle of progress, harbinger of hope: John Stuart Mill and the British political tradition. In M. McManus (Ed.), Liberalism and socialism. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79537-5_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79537-5_3

[24] Rawls, J. (1980). Kantian constructivism in moral theory: The Dewey lectures, 1980. Journal of Philosophy, 77(9), 517–571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2025790

[25] Ryan, A. (2012). The making of modern liberalism. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691148403.001.0001

[26] Sardà y Salvany, F. (1899). What is liberalism? (C. B. Pallen, Ed.). Herder.

[27] Sheldrake, P. (2007). A brief history of spirituality. Blackwell Publishing.

[28] Siegel, F. (2025). What liberals haven’t learned & why. Commonweal. https://search.opinionarchives.com/Summary/Commonweal/V116I1P16-1.htm

[29] Smith, S. B. (1991). Hegel’s critique of liberalism: Rights in context. University of Chicago Press.

[30] Sorell, T. (2021). Hobbes’s peace dividend. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 38(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/48774254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5406/21521026.38.2.03

[31] Stearns, P. N. (1975). European society in upheaval (2nd ed.). Macmillan.

Steinberger, P. J. (2008). Hobbes, Rousseau and the modern conception of the state. The Journal of Politics, 70(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238160808064X

[32] Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press.

[33] Taylor, C. (1969). Atomism. In A. Kontos (Ed.), Power, possessions and freedom: Essays in honor of C. B. Macpherson (pp. 39–54). University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487589417-005

[34] Velleman, J. D. (2015). Foundations for moral relativism (2nd expanded ed.). Open Book Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0086

[35] Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. Basic Books.

[36] Weber, M. (2021). Economy and society: A new translation. Harvard University Press.

[37] White, T. J. (2016). Thomism for the new evangelization. Thomistic Institute. https://ballyheaparish.com/resources/Thomism_for_the_New_Evangelization.pdf

[38] Williams, R. R. (2001). Beyond liberalism and communitarianism: Studies in Hegel’s philosophy of right. State University of New York Press.

[39] Wolfe, C., & Hittinger, J. (Eds.). (1994). Liberalism at the crossroads. Rowman & Littlefield.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-05

How to Cite

Blanza, M. (2026). Autonomous Freedom in Modern Liberalism’s Anthropological Project: A Theological Critique in the Light of the Incarnation. Philippine Association for the Sociology of Religion Journal, 6(1), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.63931/pasrj.v6i1.85